The week
before I went into the hospital for the kidney surgery I finished a book
entitled, “Into Thin Air” by Jon
Krakauer. It tells the story of the
author, an avid mountain climber, who was approached by a popular climber’s magazine
to go on an expedition to the base camp at Mt. Everest in order to gather
information for an article on the commercialization of the climbing of that
mountain.
The offer rekindled Krakauer’s
dream to climb Everest himself and so he agreed to do the article on the condition that the
magazine pick up the tab for the climb, not just to base camp, but to the top of Everest, and they
agreed. And so, in May of 1996, he and
his team, plus several other climbing teams set off to climb Mt. Everest. Their trek would have tragic results when a fierce,
unexpected storm strikes just below the pinnacle, wiping out many of the climbers in
his party as they tried to make their way back down to camp.
Not being an
avid climber, jogger, hiker, golfer, __?____ (fill in the blank with anything physically
demanding), reading or hearing stories like that, the immediate question that
forms in my mind is, “Why?”. Why would anyone, especially someone with a
wife or husband or children, take that kind of risk to do something that can,
and too often does, end in tragedy?
Everest
climbers seem to be a breed of people passionate about mountain climbing – the physical
challenge of it, the technicality of the climb, the competitiveness of doing
something other climbers have done, as well as the challenge of climbing a
mountain you’ve never climbed, persevering over exhaustion, high altitude, and
weather. Many of them had already
climbed other extraordinarily high peaks and Everest was just the last of the
greats for them. Even after the tragedy
of that May 1996 many of the survivors, despite having lost friends that year,
went on to climb other peaks. They know
the dangers but they can’t resist the challenging of doing it anyway.
I don’t
understand the kind of passion that causes people to want to climb physical
mountains or push to accomplish some other physical goal, but I do understand
passion – the kind that prompts one to do the unexpected, the challenging, the
adventurous, the extreme. I do
understand the passion that motivates someone to step outside their comfort
zone, to say yes when no seems like a much better idea, to see challenge as
opportunity, to keep their eye on the goal even if there is pain along the way.
I’ve seen
this passion in missionaries, serving long years in remote places, away from
family and friends, with few of the creature comforts most of us take for granted, in order to
bring hope and life to people who have never heard about Jesus.
I’ve seen it
in pastors laboring in inner city parishes, or in remote regions of our country
and our world, who keep on keeping on, often without ever seeing results in the
lives of those to whom they minister.
I’ve seen it
in the Bahamas among those who faithfully minister at a camp for those with
HIV/AIDS, providing clean water, meals and medicine to those who could never
hope to give back and who are too sick and disabled to do so, even if they
could.
One of the
things I noticed about the climbers of Everest is the motivation for their
passion – sometimes it was fame, sometimes money, sometimes it was some
personal goal they wanted to reach, sometimes it was just because Everest was
THERE, and why not climb it – for these
things they risked their lives, their health and well-being, and their future
earning possibilities and the well being of their families – for what to me just seems like bragging rights.
Isn’t it
amazing then when Jesus says, “He who
would be great among you must be the servant of all”? Not - at the top of his class, the most
intelligent, well educated, most degreed, most influential, most powerful, most physically fit? No,
in the economy of Jesus the greatest is the servant.
So what do
you think of when you think of a servant?
I think “Downton Abbey”. I think, setting aside what you might want to
do to care for others. I think, living “downstairs”
in the humblier quarters. I think,
working all hours of the day and night at the beck and call of your
master. I think, living to make your
master look good, not you. I think, “Yes
Sir, whatever you wish Sir”.
That’s the topsy turvy nature of the kingdom
of Jesus. His is the last shall be first, the
greatest is the servant, sort of kingdom.
Those who
belong to Jesus know about passion – not for fulfilling some personal best, or
gaining notoriety.
Missionaries
will give their lives for the passion to serve their Master and the people He
loves to whom He sent them. They will
serve for no reward but the pleasure of the Lord.
Pastors will
labor in spiritual vineyards their whole lives, many seeing only a glimpse of the
harvest. But they don’t work for the
harvest, they serve at the pleasure of the Harvester.
The Kingdom
of Jesus is a topsy turvy one when compared to what is valued in this earthly
one. But, as a bumper sticker I read
once said: “the rewards are out of this world”.
The Apostle
Paul describes the nature of these passionate servants of God’s kingdom like
this in I Corinthians 1:26-30:
“Brothers, think of
what you were when you were called. Not many
of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were
of noble birth. But God chose the
foolish things of the world (the servants) to shame the strong. He chose the lowly things of this world and
the despised things – and the things that are not – to nullify the things that
are, so that no one may boast before Him.
It is because of Him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us
wisdom from God – that is our righteousness, holiness and redemption. Therefore as it is written: ‘Let him who
boasts boast in the Lord.”
The servants
in the Kingdom of Jesus will be passionate about something. They will be passionate about Jesus – about His
glory, His work, His kingdom, His reputation.
If a servant is going to lose his life for anything, let it be about
Jesus because in His kingdom, to lose one’s life for His sake is to gain
eternal life.
When I was
being interviewed by the psychiatrist at NY Presbyterian Hospital in
preparation for qualifying as a kidney donor, she wanted to know if I saw the
kidney donation as some kind of “personal
best”, the culmination of my walk of faith.
I thought that was really funny.
The “personal best” of the servant of Jesus
is magnifying Jesus, making the Master look good, while the servant blends into
the background. If that's accomplished by this or anything else, then yes, it's a personal best!
No comments:
Post a Comment